Range Widely
Subscribe
Cover photo

If Humans Came From Apes, Why Are There Still Cats and Bananas?

What a Senate Candidate Doesn’t Get About Evolution

David Epstein

Mar 21
44

A decade or so ago, I had a great chat with ex-NFL star Herschel Walker about fitness, football, bobsled (he was a 1992 Winter Olympian), and mixed martial arts — at the time, he had just beaten a guy two decades his junior.

We didn’t chat about evolution by natural selection, although in retrospect, perhaps that would have been more interesting. Last week, Walker — who is now running for Senate in Georgia — trotted out his version of an old evolution-denial saw:

So let’s start with a practical example that might resonate right now. Below is a graph from Our World in Data, my favorite site on ye olde interwebs.

As you can see, in mid-2021, a number of Covid variants were circulating in the United States at the same time. Granted, they were ultimately “outcompeted” by faster spreading Delta, which was in turn outcompeted by Omicron. But now a subvariant of Omicron is spreading, diversifying the Covid landscape again. The point is that multiple variations from a common ancestor can exist at the same time.

And current pandemic aside, there are at least seven disease-causing coronaviruses found in humans. All of those evolved from a common ancestor that existed a long time ago. The common ancestor is gone (just like the original Covid-19-causing variant might be), but those progeny are alive and well. (If viruses are alive at all.)

Our global pandemic is natural selection at hyperspeed — evolution can go fast or slow — and a takeaway should be that multiple organisms that evolved from a common ancestor can exist at once. (I’m repeating this point because last week’s newsletter was on how repetition is important for countering misinformation.)

Humans and chimpanzees, for example, both evolved in different ways from a common ape ancestor. As with the common ancestor of modern coronaviruses, that common ancestor no longer exists, but its descendants — humans and chimps — still do.

If Humans Came From Apes, Why Are There Still Cats and Bananas?

The more closely related organisms are, the more DNA they share. That’s why humans share 99% of our DNA with chimps, a bit less with cats, a bit less still with mice, and even less (but still plenty) with bananas. Go back far enough, and all life shares a common ancestor; and yet here we all are, cats and bananas together.

Part of the misconception embedded in Walker’s statement is the idea that evolution proceeds along a linear trajectory toward some final, best form. (If it did, it clearly would have stopped with therizinosaurus.) As in: “Why do we need monkeys when we made it to humans?!” But that isn’t how evolution works. Evolutionary theory doesn’t suggest that apes should transform into humans (and chimps, and other apes) and disappear upon transformation.

While it is technically true that “humans came from apes,” it’s a bit confusing to put it that way. We are apes — just a particular kind — and so are chimps, orangutans, and gorillas. Those respective family trees all branched from a common ancestor.

As biologist T. Ryan Gregory put it in a great paper titled "Understanding Evolutionary Trees":

A billion or so years ago, Canada and Australia were side-by-side in a supercontinent (“Nuna”), which no longer exists.

We hairless apes may yet cause other apes to disappear, but, imo, let’s not. There is no necessity for an evolutionary ancestor to vanish just because part of a lineage goes off on another developmental path.

I have two siblings, and while they descend from the same parents, there is no reason we can’t exist at the same time, different as we are. (My younger brother is much taller; it’s annoying, but it’s probably fine if he still exists.)

Species branch from common ancestors just like family lineages, without supplanting one another. This diagram is from "Understanding Evolutionary Trees," by T. Ryan Gregory.

The same goes for our children’s children’s children. In the past, modern humans even coexisted with other types of humans, like Neanderthals. Those two tangoed, and it left marks in the DNA of many people alive today (including me).

Have Your Laugh, But Then Get Earnest

I’m not sure there’s much we can do for Herschel Walker at this point; but, to quote biologist T. Ryan Gregory’s "Understanding Evolutionary Trees" paper again:

And I think we should teach those lessons — like how you can use your own family tree to help understand evolutionary concepts — at any age, earnestly. It’s easy to poke fun at Herschel Walker, but what we do after that is what counts. I think engaging with questions about fundamental pillars of modern science is important, and not always trivial.

We can laugh at people who say that the Earth is flat — as Kyrie Irving did, to much coverage — but we who laugh might ask ourselves: “How do I know the Earth is spherical?”

This has been pretty much settled since ancient Greece. And yet, your answer (mostly likely) is that you outsource this judgment to the consensus of the scientific community. That is frequently an excellent decision-making heuristic. But perhaps you’d like to have a deeper answer. I minored in astronomy in college, and can fairly say that proving that Earth is a sphere isn’t so trivial that we should simply laugh at someone who asks for proof of something that defies their daily experience. (If, of course, they are doing so sincerely. It’s unclear to me if Irving was just trolling.) At the very least, after we laugh, we should think about what we ourselves know.

This isn’t to say that there aren’t simple proofs of Earth’s curvature, but can you think of any offhand? Perhaps that you’ve seen pictures of Earth from space? Photos are two-dimensional; that could just as well be a flat disk as a sphere.

Personally, I find epic photos like the one below, with perspective showing the curvature of the Earth, to be quite persuasive.

Credit: Aaron Foster/Getty Images

Then again, the photo atop last week’s newsletter was of a shark swimming on a flooded highway, and it looked real, even though it’s just an old photoshop job. I guess my point is that, while it’s ok to have your laugh, also have some curiosity, and ask how you know what you know.

It might be interesting for you to learn, and helpful for teaching others.

On that note, here are ten simple proofs of Earth’s curvature. Several, like #2, are accessible, and fun to teach. But some of them involve — if not some measure of scientific savvy — trust. For more on that, here’s an interesting article in Physics World on how trust is the missing component in fighting flat-Earth theory.

If you enjoyed this post, you might like last week’s newsletter on misinformation — why it works so well, and how to combat it with a "truth sandwich."

And if you learned something here, I’d love it if you’d share this post. Here’s a link. And if a friend sent this to you, you can subscribe here.

For more wide-ranging thoughts, you can follow me on Instagram or Twitter. As always, thanks for reading.

Until next time…

David

Subscribe for free to Range Widely
By subscribing, you agree to share your email address with David Epstein to receive their original content, including promotions. Unsubscribe at any time. Meta will also use your information subject to the Bulletin Terms and Policies
44

More from Range Widely
See all

Can Bad Number Sense Amplify Deadly Hate?

Here's a dire reason to be curious about the numbers around you
May 18
4
6

The Nazis Invented Marriage Counseling, And Other Surprising Relationship Research

Q&A with the bestselling author of a new book on the science of relationships
May 9
4
19

Here Are Two Tips for Picking Out Misleading Stats in the News

I used these, and it led to this newsletter’s first official correction of a scientific journal article
May 2
7
13
Comments
Log in with Facebook to comment

44 Comments

  • Nicole Lapin
    Writes The Money Minute
    Let's hear it for the therizinosaurs! 👏
    • 7w
  • Silvana Ordoñez
    Initially I thought this was about NFTs, which usually blow my mind (re: Bored Ape Yacht Club) but you blew my mind in a different and simpler way: how do I know what i know? a great way to spark another level or curiosity
    • 8w
    • Author
      David Epstein
      Haha....glad you found it thought-provoking. Although I'm sorry not to deliver on NFTs. Instead of anything useful, here's an NFT meme I thought was funny: https://twitter.com/stevekr.../status/1444281751682142214...
      Steve Krouse on Twitter
      TWITTER.COM
      Steve Krouse on Twitter
      Steve Krouse on Twitter
      • 8w
  • Jennifer Gresham
    I'll add that Bill Bryson's book, A Short History of Nearly Everything, is another way to learn how we know the Earth is (mostly) spherical, along with a lot of other things we should probably all have a basic understanding of. I've argued, mainly just…
    See more
    • 8w
    • Author
      David Epstein
      That's a great point! You know, in retrospect, I would've loved to study history formally at some point, and especially the history of science, which dovetails with your Bryson point. Increasingly, I've felt that understanding the progression of ideas …
      See more
      • 8w
    View 1 more reply
  • Andy Cravalho
    Article is complete garbage and explains origin theory with circular reasoning. Using covid- a man made virus, to say that this is natural selection at hyper speed looses all credibility. The writer does a terrible job trying to explain away Walker's q…
    See more
    • 7w
    • Edited
    • Author
      David Epstein
      Hi Andy, even if Covid were a man-altered virus, it has still evolved (where do you think the variants come from?) and still shares a common ancestor with other coronaviruses, like one that causes a common cold. Do you believe that all coronaviruses, g…
      See more
      • 7w
      • Edited
  • William Murphy
    Hi David, apologies for the late comment! I just saw that this was your most read newsletter and read through some of the comments.. I don't have any interesting comments to make on the post other than to recognise your ability to take a quote and use …
    See more
    • 7w
    • Author
      David Epstein
      Hey Will, always appreciate seeing you here! And I appreciate the note about responding to critical comments. I'm very happy to engage in spirited disagreement. With both my science-based books, I've been aware that something in them will turn out to b…
      See more
      • 7w
      • Edited
    View 3 more replies
  • James Wilkinson
    It seems to me we, meaning a large part of the world's "educated" population, have lost the willingness (ability, maybe?) to ask, let alone answer, the question, "How do I know what I know?"
    2
    • 8w
    • Edited
    • Author
      David Epstein
      Hey James, I know what you're saying. I hope it's not the case, but I feel what you mean. I wonder to what extent the pace of information flow feeds this. In last week's post, Lisa Fazio talked about how slowing down leads to better thinking. (She talk…
      See more
      • 8w
  • Matt Thomas
    Hey David, I saw that you said this was your most widely read newsletter. Do you think this was because it was about a politicized issue? If so, has this made you more or less likely to write another post that can be politicized? After all, it's amazin…
    See more
    • 7w
    • Author
      David Epstein
      Hey Matt! This newsletter ended up in the Facebook news feed, which is a big reason why it got so many more readers. Although that isn't the first time one of my posts has been in the feed, and this still got way more readers. So I think it was, first,…
      See more
      • 7w
      • Edited
  • James Crawford
    Genesis 1:26-28
    26 Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air[a]all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” 27 So God cr…
    See more
    • 8w
  • Quinton S. Lane
    We didn't come from apes or monkeys. Try actually reading about evolution it states that the three groups of primates being apes, monkeys and humans all share a common ancestor none of us came from the other we had a common ancestor then split into th…
    See more
    • 7w
    • Author
      David Epstein
      Hi Quinton, did you happen to read the entire post before commenting? It says that humans and primate cousins came from a common ancestor, as you suggest. (And, by the way, that common ancestor was an ape that lived 5-10 million years ago.) You are, th…
      See more
      • 7w
      • Edited
  • Alejandro Morales Meza
    Don't get me wrong with what I am about to say. I love science but evolutionary theories are just that theories. Who has been around for millions or thousands of year to have observed all those changes that they propose to be able to state them as fa…
    See more
    • 7w
    • Author
      David Epstein
      Hi Alejandro, I appreciate this note, because I think it's earnest. I also think there are two important misconceptions in your comment. First: the idea that one would have to have been around for thousands or millions of years to have directly observe…
      See more
      • 7w
      • Edited
View 7 more comments
Share quoteSelect how you’d like to share below
Share on Facebook
Share to Twitter
Send in Whatsapp
Share on Linkedin
Privacy  ·  Terms  ·  Cookies  ·  © Meta 2022
Discover fresh voices. Tune into new conversations. Browse all publications